Use cases
Industries
Products
Resources
Company
You may have spent the past two years learning the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and, if you have customers overseas, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Updating your internal processes was tough, and just when you were getting the hang of it, California turned around and passed another data privacy law. The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), passed in November 2020, expands the CCPA that you know and love so well (or maybe not so much). And like the CCPA, the CPRA has a long reach, impacting organizations far beyond California’s borders.
Right now, businesses must continue complying with the CCPA, but plenty of changes must be made by January 1, 2023. Consumers have several new rights relevant to data subject access requests (DSARs), and enforcement is maturing.
You’ll need to review several updated definitions, including what constitutes a business regulated by the law. For its definition of a business, the CPRA increases the threshold number of consumers or households from 50,000 to 100,000. Businesses now include those that generate most of their revenue from sharing personal information (PI)—not only selling it.
The updated definition will pull in new businesses and free some small-to-midsize companies.
The CPRA looks like the GDPR in a few ways, particularly concerning the data you’re allowed to store and use. It formalizes data minimization.
Covered organizations should officially only collect, use, retain, and share PI reasonably necessary and proportionate to your disclosed purposes. You have to tell consumers your retention periods for your PI categories, and those periods should be reasonably required, too.
Speaking of your intentions for the data, you can’t collect or use PI for a new reason incompatible with your previously disclosed purposes without first telling consumers.
Your company may already strive to minimize data collection and retention because of GDPR. Or simply because storing redundant, outdated, and trivial (ROT) data is costly and presents a cybersecurity risk. But if you haven’t focused on this issue in recent years, now’s the time to start. Authorities could hold you liable for failing to minimize data even if non-compliance doesn’t lead to additional violations.
There’s a bright side to most things. Data minimization is initially a burden, but it helps in the long run by limiting the data you must comb through after receiving verified DSARs. However, with the right tools in place, sorting and altering data shouldn’t be painful, no matter how much of it there is.
Under the CPRA, your company has to consider Sensitive PI. This shouldn’t cause too much anxiety because it isn’t technically a new data category. CCPA protected Sensitive PI all along. The critical distinction is that the CPRA creates new disclosure and consent requirements for Sensitive PI versus other PI types.
Sensitive PI includes:
To better protect Sensitive PI, you’ll have to update disclosure requirements, purpose limitation requirements, opt-out requirements for use and disclosure, and opt-in consent standards for use and disclosure.
What’s good news for consumers’ data privacy might be hard for you to hear. There are several new and modified rights, and your business may need to adjust its internal processes within the next two years to avoid violations. These are bound to impact your disclosures and DSAR response process.
Here’s a quick overview of the new consumer rights:
Some of the privacy rights you already know are changing:
The CPRA takes a page out of the GDPR playbook and creates an enforcement body. The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) will investigate and enforce the rules—and have rule making powers to keep data privacy rights up to date in the years to come.
What’s most important is the loss of the 30-day cure period. Right now, if the Office of the Attorney General notifies you of an alleged violation, you have time to fix it. That grace period won’t be available under the CPRA, which makes proactive compliance that much more important.
By now, your business has implemented processes for validating and responding to DSARs. Unless you’re a business newly regulated by the CPRA, you aren’t starting from scratch.
But in evaluating the changes you need to make over the next two years, you might find your processes aren’t as efficient as you’d like. Your manual review process or third-party vendor might be time-consuming and costly. At this point, it’s more than an inconvenience. It’s a legal risk. A difficult process is more likely to break down and lead to a violation.
Reviewing data in response to a valid DSAR doesn’t have to be a thankless task. There are pain-relieving technologies that were perfected for a similar process—discovery during litigation.
With the right tool, finding the relevant data and acting on it can take minutes instead of weeks or months. Equally important to efficiency, your DSAR process can gain security, consistency, and defensibility—not to mention the abiding appreciation of your coworkers.